Tag Archives: Business

Whole Foods’ Co-Founder Pushes For “Conscious” Not “Crony” Capitalism

Lauren Lyster at Yahoo’s Daily Ticker writes about Whole Foods CEO John Mackey’s new push for “conscious capitalism,” and an end to cronyism and corporate welfare:

“What we have in the U.S. today has moved far away from free enterprise capitalism,” Mackey argues. “It’s really a type of crony capitalism, where you have the government and big business frequently collaborating together in ways that may not result in the greatest common good.”

The book cites the government bailouts of “too big to fail” members of the financial sector during the meltdown of 2008 as prime examples of “crony capitalism”.

John Mackey: Why Companies Should Embrace Conscious Capitalism

Dan Schawbel from Forbes Magazine interviewed John Mackey, the CoFounder of Whole Foods Market. Mr. Mackey speaks about the role of entrepreneurship and competition in creating value, innovation and adding prosperity in a capitalist society. He makes a clear stand for “Conscious Capitalism,” which calls for businesses rejecting uncompetitive, disloyal practices related to cronyism, while embracing a conscious responsible way of doing business.

“Free enterprise capitalism has been the most powerful creative system of social cooperation and human progress ever conceived, but its perception and its role in society have been distorted.”

“Operating under the conscious capitalism model will show that businesses are the true value creators that can push all of humanity upward for continuous improvement. Businesses around the globe need to steer capitalism away from today’s growing trend of cronyism, by embracing conscious capitalism.”

Crony Capsule 4: When Big Government and Big Business Get Married

One of the most familiar forms of cronyism is the close relationship between big business and the government. This form of corporate welfare is particularly outrageous since most of these large companies are perfectly able to compete and earn money on their own. It is unacceptable to see big companies like Apple, Caterpillar, Boeing and several other Fortune 500 listed companies getting special treatment from their friends in the government.

There is no need for federal, state, or local governments to give them any form of tax incentives, loans or subsidies. These corporations should only get rewarded in the market system when they create value for their consumers.

The following articles give us examples of this type of corporate cronyism in action today:

1.  This article shows how Texas is giving $21 million to Apple to “incentivize” them to move away from California. Local governments give billions of dollars to “convince” corporations to do business in their states at local taxpayer’s cost.

‘Supporters of tax incentives will argue that this incentive package will add will add 3,600 jobs to the economy, but this is still a bad deal. First, it’s not clear if these jobs will actually be created; research consistently shows that state incentive programs fail to produce the jobs and economic activity that they promise. Second, it ignores that jobs are lost in the private sector when the government creates jobs.’

2. The following article is a clear example of how local governments are creating incentives for private companies to bring businesses to their states, but at the cost of the workers in their state. These incentives allow businesses to keep their employees income taxes, without even informing them. These types of incentives only foster cronyism among companies, pushing them to seek further government favors rather than be more competitive and cost-efficient.

“States are allowing private companies to withhold personal income taxes from their employees, and keep the money for themselves. According to a recent report from Good Jobs First, more than 2,700 companies in 16 states do this, totaling nearly $700 million each year.”

3. In this example, we see how this terrible form of corporate welfare uses different governmental entities in order to receive special incentives. The Essential Air Service program is a federal program that subsidizes flights and small airports to function. These subsidies go from the small airports straight into big airline companies that benefits from the program. Taxpayer’s money is wasted on empty airplane seats, which doesn’t seem to bother the airline one bit.

“This is absolutely outrageous, said Florida Rep. John Mica, the Republican chairman of the House Transportation Committee, which oversees the Air Service. “You know we’re running $17 trillion in deficit.”

“The Scripps National Investigative Team’s investigation exposed one flight between Baltimore and Hagerstown, Md. — about 75 miles apart — was so sparse, the captain allowed the only other passenger who wasn’t the team’s producer to sit in the co-pilot’s seat. Some seats remained folded down for the round trip.”

4.  When governments try to help business at any cost, they often end up stimulating unprofitable and inefficient projects. In this article, we see how Pinellas County (Florida) charged the taxpayers millions of dollars for a construction project that never even started.

Chiquita’s corporate welfare: a triumph for the fallacy of the seen and the unseen

Fergus Hodgson at the Locker Room blog writes about a case in North Carolina where a specific company received millions of dollars in incentives to move their headquarters to the state. The author also uses the opportunity to teach about the broken window fallacy.

Will Corporate Welfare Slow International Trade?

Rich Tehrani, blogger at TMCnet, asks an interesting question in a recent blog post:

Looking at this from a US perspective we have witnessed in the last ten years that the government has bailed out airlines, auto makers, GE and banks while spending billions on renewable energy and other stimulus programs designed in many cases to boost the sales of domestic companies.

The point is, how does any country determine if another country is competing unfairly anymore?

If the businesses within different countries are being supported by the government, does this lead to a slowdown of international trade? Only time will tell, but if businesses were allowed to succeed or fail based on the value they created then everyone would be better off.

Using tax code to modify behavior is a boon for big business, lawyers, lobbyists

Tim Carney at the Washington Examiner writes about the recent trend of using the tax code to favor certain businesses or industries, and gives two reasons why big business benefits from this cronyism over small businesses:

1) The big guys don’t find it as much of a pain as the little guys. This gives the big guys an advantage, and the big guys have better lobbyists.

2) Lobbyists, accountants, and lawyers all obviously benefit from this regime. They are the means by which the business owners interact with policy. It’s the principal-agent problem: the agents benefit from the complexity that harms their principals.

Study: Lobbying bad for business?

Politico’s Tim Mak uncovers a recent study by Rice University which found that massive lobbying, hiring former public officials, and campaign donations by top corporations lead to poorer market performance.

“In a surprising finding, a new study shows that massive lobbying in D.C. and campaign donations by corporations are linked with worse market performance.

“The Rice University study looked at the amount of money spent on lobbying and campaigning donations by 943 S&P 1500 firms between 1998 and 2008 and found that so-called political investments lead to weaker performance in terms of stock value and return on assets.”

Taken for a Ride

Jeff Horwitz and Chris Cumming explore how New York City’s recent taxi fare raise is benefitting the “deep-pocketed” medallion owners while leaving drivers and passengers in the dust.

“When New York’s Taxi and Limousine Commission held a public hearing last week to consider whether to raise taxi fares by 20 percent, cabdrivers pled poverty and passengers argued that fares are too high. Paradoxically, both groups were right.”

A New Wall of Separation: End Corporate Welfare

David Bier at the OpenMarket blog writes about the need for a wall of separation between business and government, noting that the current situation has harmed society:

Bailouts have sunk billions of taxpayer dollars into failed banks, corporations, and other private organizations since the financial crisis began in late 2008. At the same time, corporate subsidies have increased dramatically as policymakers have attempted to stimulate the economy…Rather than creating products that create prosperity for society, corporate success has become tied to managing political relationships through lobbyists and political intelligence firms.